THE CONDITIONS FOR MAJORITARIAN OBLIGATION: MAJORITY RULE AND DELIBERATIVE BODY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21783/rei.v1i1.25Palabras clave:
Collective Decision, Deliberation, Majoritarianism, Aggregation of Preferences, Decision-MakingResumen
Considering one of Georg Simmel’s questions, the article examines what gives an authority to an outnumbering superiority in a situation of a collective decision. Actually there are three conditions in that matter. First, the majority obligation for a collection of individuals’ decisions is possible only if this body is a deliberative body that is to say a collective entity but not a mere collection of individuals. Second, the stake of the decision must not challenge the members’ liking for this collective entity. Finally, to have a legitimate majority, the aggregation of preferences must be reached after a deliberation, thus stressing there might have been other preferences. If the preferences are the same or do not result from the deliberative body’s deliberation, the collective decision looks like a shared decision, a fair one is wished. The rule of the majority is not relevant any longer.Descargas
Citas
ADAM PRZEWORSKI, DEMOCRACY AND THE LIMITS OF SELF-GOVERNMENT (2010).
Adam Przeworski, Self-Government in Our Times, 12 ANNUAL REVIEW OF POLITICAL SCIENCE 71 (2009).
ALAIN BOUREAU, KANTOROWICZ: STORIES OF A HISTORIAN (S.G. Nichols & G.M. Spiegel transl., 2001).
Alain Boureau, Les moines anglais et la construction du politique (début du XIIIè siècle), 54 ANNALES: HISTOIRE, SCIENCES SOCIALES 3 (1999).
ARISTOTLE, THE METAPHYSICS (J.H. McMahon transl., 2008).
Ben Saunders, Democracy, Political Equality, and Majority Rule, 121 ETHICS 1 (2010).
Bernard Manin, On legitimacy and political deliberation, 15 POLITICAL THEORY 3 (E. Stein & J. Mansbridge transl., 1987).
CHAIM PERELMAN & LUCIE OLBRECHTS-TYTECA, THE NEW RHETORIC: A TREATY OF ARGUMENTATION (J. Wilkenson & P. Weaver transl., 1969).
Douglas Rae, Decision rules and individual values in constitutional choice, 63 AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW 1 (1969).
Douglas Rae, The limits of consensual decision, 69 AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW 4 (1975).
Elizabeth Anscombe, On Frustration of the Majority by Fulfilment of the Majority’s Will, 36 ANALYSIS 4 (1976).
ERNST H. KANTOROWICZ, THE FUNDAMENTAL ISSUE: DOCUMENTS AND MARGINAL NOTES ON THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOYALTY OATH (1950).
Georg Simmel, The Phenomenon of Outvoting, in THE SOCIOLOGY OF GEORG SIMMEL (Kurt H. Wolff transl. and ed., 1964).
Hans Kelsen, Foundations of Democracy, 66 ETHICS 1 (1955).
HANS KELSEN, THE ESSENCE AND VALUE OF DEMOCRACY (N. Urbinati & C. Invernazzi eds., Brian Graf transl., 2013).
Jane Mansbridge, Deliberation and Self-Interest, in DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY AND ITS DISCONTENTS (S. Besson & J.L. Marti eds., 2006).
Jane Mansbridge, Should blacks represent blacks and women represent women? A contingent “yes”, 61 JOURNAL OF POLITICS 3 (1999).
JEAN GAUDEMET, LES ÉLECTIONS DANS L’EGLISE LATINE: DES ORIGINES AUX XVIÈ SIÈCLE (1979).
Jean-Jacques Rousseau, The Right of the stronger, in THE SOCIAL CONTRACT AND OTHER LATER POLITICAL WRITINGS (V. Gourevitch ed. And transl., 1997).
JEAN LE BOINDRE, DÉBATS DU PARLEMENT DE PARIS PENDANT LA MINORITÉ DE LOUIS XIV, VOL. 1 (1997).
JEREMY BENTHAM, POLITICAL TACTICS (1999).
JEREMY WALDRON, THE DIGNITY OF LEGISLATION (1999).
JOHN LOCKE, TWO TREATISES OF GOVERNMENT (I. Shapiro ed., 2003).
JOHN ROGISTER, LOUIS XV AND THE PARLEMENT OF PARIS, 1737-55 (1995).
JÖRG PELTZER, CANON LAW, CAREERS AND CONQUEST (2008).
Kenneth O. May, A set of independent necessary and sufficient conditions for simple majority decision, 20 ECONOMETRIA 4 (1952).
LANI GUINIER, THE TYRANNY OF THE MAJORITY: FUNDAMENTAL FAIRNESS IN REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY (1994).
Mathias Risse, Arguing for Majority Rule, 2 THE JOURNAL OF POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY 1 (2004).
MONTESQUIEU, THE SPIRIT OF LAWS (A. Cohler, B.C. Miller & H.S. Stone eds., 1989).
PETER GEACH, REFERENCE AND GENERALITY: AN EXAMINATION OF SOME MEDIEVAL AND MODERN THEORIES (1962).
PHILIPPE URFALINO & CATHERINE VILKAS, LA DELEGATION DU JUGEMENT ESTHÉTIQUE: LES FONDS RÉGIONAUX D’ART CONTEMPORAIN (1995).
PLINY THE YOUNGER, LETTERS (Bk. II, Letter XII).
Stéphanie Novak, Majority Rule, 9 PHILOSOPHY COMPASS 10 (2014).
STEVEN BRAMS & ALAN TAYLOR, FAIR DIVISION: FROM CAKE-CUTTING TO DISPUTE RESOLUTION (1996).
THUCYDIDES, THE HISTORY OF THE PELOPONNESIAN WAR (R. Crawley transl., 2004).
VINCENT DESCOMBES, LES EMBARRAS DE L’IDENTITÉ (2013).
VINCENT DESCOMBES, THE INSTITUTIONS OF MEANING: A DEFENSE OF ANTHROPOLOGICAL HOLISM (S.A. Schwartz transl., 2014).
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
- Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
- Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
- Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online após a publicação na revista.
