ESTADO ADMINISTRATIVO NORTE-AMERICANO E COVID-19: contexto e perspectivas
Resumo
Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
PDFReferências
Almeida, Maíra. ESTADO ADMINISTRATIVO NORTE-AMERICANO CONTEMPORÂNEO: transformação permanente, diálogos de poderes e perspectivas simbióticas entre teorias e casos. Tese de Doutorado apresentada ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 2019.
BICKEL, Alexander. The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1962.
BOLONHA, Carlos. ; RANGEL, Henrique; ALMEIDA, Maíra. A Proposta de uma Constituição Sistêmica. Nomos (Fortaleza), v. 34, p. 13-38, 2014.
BREYER, Stephen et. al. Administrative Law and Regulatory Policy: Problems, Text, and Case. 7. ed. New York: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, 2011.
CHIEM, L. DC Circ. Declines to Reconsider Amtrak Due Process Ruling. Law360 (Sep. 12, 2016) Disponível em: . Acesso em: 30 maio 2017.
ESKRIDGE Jr. William; BAER, Lauren. The Continuum of Deference: Supreme Court Treatment of Agency Statutory Interpretations from Chevron to Hamdan. Yale: Yale Law School Faculty Scholarship Series, 2008, p. 1083-142.
GERSEN, Jacob; VERMEULE, A. Thin Rationality Review. Michigan Law Review, v. 114, p. 1355, 2016.
CRAIG, Paul. The Legitimacy of US Administrative Law and the Foundations of English Administrative Law: Setting the Historical Record Straight. Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper Series, 2016.
HAMBURGER, Philip. Is Administrative Law Unlawful? Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2014.
MASHAW, Jerry L. Creating the Administrative Constitution: The Lost One Hundred Years of American Administrative Law. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2012.
MILES, Thomas; SUNSTEIN, Cass. Do Judges Make Regulatory Policy? An Empirical Investigation of Chevron, Chicago: University of Chicago Law Review, 2006.
NOTE. Major Question Objections. Harvard Law Review, v. 129, p. 2191, 2015-2016.
PRESSMAN, Jeffrey L.; WILDAVSKY, Aaron B. Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington Are Dashed in Oakland. Berkeley: University of California Press. 1973.
SCALIA, Antonin. Vermont Yankee: The APA, the D.C. Circuit, and the Supreme Court. Supreme Court Review, p. 345, 1978.
SINGER, Joseph. No Freedom without Regulation: The Hidden Lesson of the Subprime Crisis. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2015.
SUNSTEIN, Cass R. Incompletely Theorized Agreements in Constitutional Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Public Law & Legal Theory Working Paper, n. 147, 2007.
______. Lochner’s Legacy. Columbia Law Review, New York, v. 87, p. 873-919, 1987.
______. "Social Norms and Social Roles." Columbia Law Review 96, no. 4 (1996): 903-68. doi:10.2307/1123430. Acesso em 08 de julho de 2020.
SUNSTEIN, Cass; VERMEULE, Adrian. Libertarian Administrative Law. University of Chicago Law Review, v. 82, p. 393, 2015.
YACKEE, Jacob; YACKEE, Susan. Testing the Ossification Thesis: An Empirical Examination of Federal Regulatory Volume and Speed, 1950-1990. George Washington Law Review, v. 80, p. 1414-53, 2012.
ZAROCOSTAS, John. How to fight an infodemic. Lancet 395, 676 (2020). Disponível em: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)30461-X/fulltext Acesso em 09 de julho 2020.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21783/rei.v6i3.567
Métricas do artigo
Metrics powered by PLOS ALM
Apontamentos
- Não há apontamentos.
Direitos autorais 2020 Maíra Villela Almeida, Beatriz Scamilla Jardim de Moraes Oliveira

Esta obra está licenciada sob uma licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.