THE RIGHT OF DISSENT AND AMERICA'S DEBT TO HERODOTUS AND THUCYDIDES

Auteurs

  • Ronald D. Rotunda Chapman University

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.21783/rei.v1i1.23

Mots-clés :

American Constitutionalism, U.S. Supreme Court, Freedom of Speech, War, Right of Dissent

Résumé

The United States prides itself as a country that respects free speech, the right of all persons to criticize the government even in times of war. However, it was not always so. The events related to World War I brought the first cases raising free speech issues to the U.S. Supreme Court. While several justices, in particular, Oliver Wendell Holmes, praised free speech, the Court upheld all the Government prosecutions of dissidents. It has taken nearly a century since those cases for the Supreme Court to come full circle and now protect those who criticize the Government in time of war. When the Court changed its views to create the modern protections, it relied on philosophical justifications for free speech that go all the way back to the ancient Greeks, 2,400 years ago. The modern justification for free speech relies on these philosophers from ancient Greece. There is little new under the sun. While governments typically believe that, for the public good, they must censor speech and squelch dissenters in time of war, the Greeks believed that their free speech made them stronger, not weaker. There are those who argue it is more difficult for a democracy to go to war because it cannot conduct the war successfully if the people oppose it and dissenters remain free to criticize. That is a good thing, not a bad thing. In modern times, no democracy has warred against another. As Pericles reminds us, “[t]he great impediment to action is, in our opinion, not discussion, but the want of knowledge that is gained by discussion preparatory to action.” As other countries embrace democracy and protections for dissidents, our increased freedoms should bring us more peace and less war.

Téléchargements

Les données relatives au téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponibles.

Biographie de l'auteur

Ronald D. Rotunda, Chapman University

Doy & Dee Henley Chair and Distinguished Professor of Jurisprudence, Fowler School of Law, Chapman University, USA

Références

AESCHYLUS, PLAYS, 2 VOLS. (1922–1926).

A. KELLY & W. HARBISON, THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTION: ITS ORIGINS AND DEVELOPMENT (1970).

ALAN RYAN, ON POLITICS: A HISTORY OF POLITICAL THOUGHT: FROM HERODOTUS TO THE PRESENT (2012).

Alexis Anderson, The Formative Period of First Amendment Theory, 1870–1915, 24 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL HISTORY 56 (1980).

CHARLES WARREN, THE MAKING OF THE CONSTITUTION (1928).

DAVID M. RABBAN, FREE SPEECH IN ITS FORGOTTEN YEARS, 1870-1920 (1999).

David M. Rabban, The Emergence of Modern First Amendment Doctrine, 50 UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW REVIEW 1205 (1983).

David M. Rabban, The First Amendment in its Forgotten Years, 90 YALE LAW JOURNAL 516 (1981).

Eugene Volokh, Crime-Facilitating Speech, 57 STANFORD LAW REVIEW 1095 (2005).

Frederic Kellogg, Learned Hand and the Great Train Ride, 56 THE AMERICAN SCHOLAR 471 (1987).

Harry Kalven, Jr., Professor Ernst Freund and Debs v. United States, 40 UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW REVIEW 235 (1973).

HERODOTUS, HISTORIES, 4 VOLS. (1922–1931).

Howard Owen Hunter, Problems in Search of Principles: The First Amendment in the Supreme Court from 1791–1930, 35 EMORY LAW JOURNAL 59 (1986).

I.F. STONE, THE TRIAL OF SOCRATES (1988).

John F. Kennedy, Response to Questionnaire, SATURDAY REVIEW, 29 de outubro de 1960.

J.S. STEPHEN, A HISTORY OF THE CRIMINAL LAW OF ENGLAND, VOL. 2 (1883).

LEONARD LEVY, JEFFERSON AND CIVIL LIBERTIES: THE DARKER SIDE (1963).

Michael Kent Curtis, Lincoln, Vallandigham, and the Anti-War Speech in the Civil War, 7 WM. & MARY BILL OF RIGHTS JOURNAL 105 (1998).

Nathaniel L. Nathanson, The Philosophy of Mr. Justice Brandeis and Civil Liberties Today, in SIX JUSTICES ON CIVIL RIGHTS (R.D. Rotunda ed., 1983).

Paul Freund, The Debs Case and Freedom of Speech, 19 THE NEW REPUBLIC 13 (1919), reprinted in 40 UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW REVIEW 239 (1973).

Pericles, Funeral Oration, in, THUCYDIDES: TRANSLATED INTO ENGLISH (B. Jowett transl., 1881).

RESPECTFULLY QUOTED: A DICTIONARY OF QUOTATIONS (Library of Congress ed., 2010).

Richard Posner, Star of the Legal Stage, WALL STREET JOURNAL, August 9, 1989 (Midwest ed.).

Ronald D. Rotunda, Egypt's Constitutional Do-Over: This Time Around, Take a Closer Look at America's Bill of Rights, WALL STREET JOURNAL, July 17, 2013.

Ronald D. Rotunda, Exporting American Freedoms, in MODEL, RESOURCE, OR OUTLIER? WHAT EFFECT HAS THE U.S. CONSTITUTION HAD ON THE RECENTLY ADOPTED CONSTITUTIONS OF OTHER NATIONS?, 12, 17 de maio de 2013.

RONALD D. ROTUNDA & JOHN E. NOWAK, TREATISE ON CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: SUBSTANCE AND PROCEDURE (2012).

SHELDON M. NOVICK, HONORABLE JUSTICE: THE LIFE OF OLIVER WENDELL HOLMES (1989).

TATYANA ECKSTRAND, THE LIBRARIAN'S BOOK OF QUOTES (2009).

Thomas Jefferson, Jefferson’s Letter to Mrs. Adams, July 22, 1804, 4, JEFFERSON'S WORKS (H. Washington ed., 1853).

THOMAS M. COOLEY, CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITATIONS (1927).

Victor Navasky, Press Limits: Censorship or Prudence; Pentagon Rules Impose Illegal Prior Restraint, LEGAL TIMES, 28 de janeiro de 1991.

WILLIAM O. DOUGLAS, THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE (1958).

William Shakespeare, Act III, scene ii, JULIUS CAESAR.

ZECHARIAH CHAFEE, FREE SPEECH IN THE UNITED STATES (1942).

Publiée

2016-01-31

Comment citer

Rotunda, R. D. (2016). THE RIGHT OF DISSENT AND AMERICA’S DEBT TO HERODOTUS AND THUCYDIDES. REI - REVISTA ESTUDOS INSTITUCIONAIS, 1(1), 104–143/144. https://doi.org/10.21783/rei.v1i1.23

Numéro

Rubrique

Artigos